Unintended Dual Agency
Unintended Dual Agency
By Bryan Mashian
A dual agency may be created unintentionally, which may have severe consequences for the real estate broker and others. If the dual agency is neither disclosed to nor approved by both parties to the transaction, undisclosed dual agent cannot recover any compensation, and a principal can rescind the transaction. Unintended dual agency can occur whether one or two brokers are involved.
In the single-broker scenario, the listing broker, who is hired by the seller to sell the property, meets a prospective buyer, for example at an open house or through the listing broker’s marketing efforts. The interested buyer does not have a broker and asks the listing agent for help. At this point, the law allows agency elections and relationships to be made by agreement of the principals and the broker. Some brokers as a matter of principle simply refuse to act as a dual agent in order to avoid the conflict of interest inherent in simultaneously representing two principals. But, if the listing agent so choses, the agent may act as a dual agent, or continue to represent only the seller. The listing agent cannot act solely as the agent for the buyer. If the parties do not make an express agreement, an agency relationship can be implied from the parties’ conduct. So, if the listing broker then works with the buyer to complete the sale, the single broker often becomes a dual agent.
When the single agent is only the seller’s agent but provides assistance to the other party, the courts have found the agent to be a dual agent in certain situations. For example, when the seller’s broker negotiated a loan on behalf of the buyer, the broker was held to be a dual agent. Also, when the buyer’s broker approached the property owner on behalf of his clients and subsequently entered into a listing agreement for the sale of the property, that broker was held to be a dual agent.
Who pays the broker’s compensation does not necessarily determine the agency relationship. But, depending on other factors, payment of the commission is a strong indicator that an agency relationship exists between the broker and the paying party. The two-broker scenario arises when there are different salespersons licensed under the same broker. Each salesperson is an employee of the broker and their actions are the actions of the employing broker. The real estate industry usually characterizes real estate agents as “independent contractors” for tax purposes, which may create a misunderstanding. But all listing contracts and all commissions are in the name of the broker, and all salespersons are employees of the broker, regardless of their status for tax purposes.
When one salesperson obtains the listing and represents the seller, and another salesperson employed by the same broker represents the buyer, they both act as employees of the same broker. That broker thereby becomes a dual agent representing both parties. So, if a listing broker does not want to be a dual agent, referring the buyer to another agent with the same broker will not avoid such dual agency.
The unintended dual agency also arises when the same broker, through two of its salespersons, represents two prospective buyers competing for the same property. This is not unusual for many large brokerage organizations with numerous salespersons. In this situation, the broker has a conflict of interest since the broker owes fiduciary duties to both buyers. These duties include the obligation of undivided loyalty, the duty to negotiate for the best price and terms for the benefit of the buyer, and the duty to disclose all material matters that would affect the buyer’s decision.
Sometimes the listing broker is the agent of the seller and two salespersons employed by the broker represent competing buyers. Here, there are multiple dual agencies present. The broker has to disclose to seller and both competing buyers the existence of both potential buyers, and the negotiations may result in a breach of fiduciary duty to one or more of the principals. Since dual agency can be implied based on certain facts, it is good practice for the broker to document the intended agency relationship. If the broker provides assistance to a party whom the broker does not represent, such as providing comparable properties, furnishing reports or answering questions regarding the reports, the broker should document that this assistance does not change the agency relationship and is provided only as a courtesy.
- Duration of Seller Warranties 4 Sep 2015
- Assume Loan or Take Subject To? 15 Jun 2015
- Cotenancy Breach Remedies 2 Apr 2015
- Finder – a precarious status 1 Dec 2014
- Commercial Brokers Must Disclose Agency 1 Sep 2014
- Risks of circumventing the safety clause 1 Aug 2014
- Making Enduring Sublease Deals 1 Jul 2014
- Emails May Create Deals – Unsuspectingly 24 Jun 2014
- Unintended Dual Agency 24 May 2014
- Perils of Dual Agency 23 Apr 2014
- Impact of CAM Estimates in LOIs 23 Feb 2014
- Liquidated Damages in a Rising Market 14 Jan 2014
- Limits of Profit Sharing in Leases 14 Dec 2013
- “Or nominee” and Its Problems 14 Nov 2013
- New Energy Use Disclosure Laws 14 Jul 2013
- New ADA Laws Could Provide Relief 14 Jun 2013
- Option to Extend May be a Mirage 14 May 2013
- Right of First Refusal and Broker’s Commission 14 Apr 2013
- Is broker paid after listing expires? 14 Mar 2013
- Seven Steps to Expedite Sales 14 Feb 2013
- Navigating CAM Expenses 14 Jan 2013
- Indirect Control of Lease Transfers 14 Dec 2012
- Impact of Foreclosure on Security Deposits 14 Nov 2012
- Negotiating Exclusive Uses 14 Oct 2012
- Build-Outs Made Easy 14 Sep 2012
- Profit Sharing In Leases 14 Aug 2012
- Recapture Rights In Leases 14 Jun 2012
- Structuring Lease Terminations 14 Apr 2012
- Owners Should Control Environmental Audit 14 Jan 2012
- Protecting Against Specific Performance Lawsuits 14 Dec 2011
- Impact of Foreclosure on Leases 14 Nov 2011
- Seller Can’t Hide Behind An “As-Is” Clause 14 Oct 2011
- Achieving Flexibility in Leases 14 Aug 2011